Learn for free
Agency — We run it for you
Consulting — We guide your team
Our Courses
Ongoing Upskilling Report
An ongoing look at the skills B2B marketers are prioritising, the formats they prefer, and what gets in the way of turning learning into execution.
At a glance
AI led the list. But the rest of the picture is still deeply practical: demand gen, brand building, measurement, research, content, and better systems for execution.
This is a snapshot of how B2B marketers are investing in upskilling right now — what they want to learn, what stops them, and where the budget actually goes. The signal is clear: marketers are not short on motivation. They are short on time, room to apply what they learn, and training that actually helps them execute.
The strongest signals from the dataset, before we open any chapter. Each one points to the same underlying pattern: B2B marketers are motivated and self-directed — but the systems around them are not keeping up.
AI leads by a wide margin. But the ambition to learn it is running ahead of the structures teams have to support it.
AI was the clear standout. But this is not a market abandoning fundamentals. Demand generation, brand building, measurement, research, and content all remain core priorities. That tells us the real need is not replacing modern B2B marketing with AI. It is integrating AI into an already-demanding role.
Top skills marketers are prioritising
Multiple selections allowed. Ranked by the share of respondents who selected each area.
Multi-select — percentages reflect the share selecting each option and will exceed 100% in total.
AI has become table stakes for curiosity and experimentation, but marketers are still trying to improve the harder, slower disciplines that shape pipeline over time.
If a course or resource only promises information, it will struggle. The winning offer is a clearer system for applying that information in a live B2B environment.
Demand generation, measurement, research, messaging, and brand all sit close together. That points to a need for integrated learning rather than narrow point-solution training.
Marketers know what good training looks like. The gap is in whether their organisations give them access to it.
The preferred outcomes and formats line up neatly. People want training that makes them better at the job, easier to execute, and realistic to consume. That means flexible does matter, but only when it is paired with practical application.
What makes training feel worth it
Performance and confidence mattered far more than credentials, novelty, or career advancement.
Formats that work best
Self-serve won, but only when paired with structure, examples, templates, and useful media around it.
Multi-select — percentages reflect the share selecting each option and will exceed 100% in total.
Where marketers go to learn
LinkedIn led the pack, followed by formal training, communities, and podcasts/YouTube. Practical education is already being discovered in the channels marketers use every week.
How often marketers invest in upskilling
Single-select. Asked in the current survey wave, so this view builds as new responses arrive.
The biggest barrier isn’t motivation. It’s the gap between finishing a course and being able to apply it at work.
The open-text responses were strikingly consistent. Most people are already learning. The challenge is making space to apply it, adapting it to a real business context, and getting enough buy-in to do something different.
Marketers are already learning. Motivation is not the problem.
Making room inside BAU work to use what was learned.
Showing the performance gains that 76% judge training by.
The biggest issue was not interest. It was finding enough room inside BAU work to actually use what was learned.
“The time and space to apply learnings.”Anonymous B2B marketer
Marketers want roadmaps, examples, and follow-up - not just content. The real gap is implementation design.
“Without immediate application or real-life scenarios, it’s easy for new knowledge to fade.”Anonymous B2B marketer
Even when people know what to do next, internal alignment often determines whether they can do it.
“It’s always hard to get leadership to agree to any major change in direction.”Anonymous marketing leader
For smaller teams, the constraint is often the budget to test, the tools to support execution, or the headcount to follow through.
“Sometimes the tools are not there, or the budget for the tools needed is not there.”Anonymous small-team marketer
Coded from open-text responses — one answer can touch several themes, so percentages can total more than 100%.
Budget shapes what’s possible. Approval requirements shape what gets started. Seasonality tells you when.
The purchase environment is still messy. Ad hoc budgets dominate, direct autonomy is the minority case, and approval often sits across both line management and formal people teams. That changes how training needs to be justified internally.
Typical training budgets available
The most common reality is not a structured L&D budget. It is ad hoc spend, smaller budget bands, or no budget at all.
Who usually has to approve spend
Most respondents still described some form of approval path, which means the internal business case matters almost as much as the training itself.
Most approval language routes through managers, directors, founders, or leadership teams first.
In a meaningful minority of cases, approval also runs through HR, L&D, or People and Culture.
Seasonality
January, December, and the mid-year window show the strongest pull, but the differences are modest — demand stays steadier across the year than you might expect. That suggests upskilling is becoming an always-on behaviour rather than a once-a-year event.
Pre-filled from the live benchmark. Edit the bracketed parts, then send it.
Three signals run through the entire dataset. They’re not new problems. They’re persistent ones.
This is the part that matters most if you are building training, buying it, or deciding what to focus on next inside your team.
AI dominated the survey, but the broader pattern is still foundational: demand gen, brand building, measurement, research, and systems thinking remain the core work marketers are trying to sharpen.
The preferred formats all point in the same direction: flexible, practical, easy to apply. People are not asking for more theory. They are asking for clearer execution support.
The strongest outcomes were better individual performance and confidence in execution. That suggests people care more about getting better at the job than collecting credentials.
Being in the company of other great B2B marketers. For solo in-house marketers like me, the impostor syndrome is real.Anonymous solo in-house marketer On why peer exposure matters
“I have had to see the full picture, and eventually moved into RevOps, where I could bring it all together - aligning strategy, process, and people across the revenue engine.”Anonymous revenue operations leader On what drove career progress
“Sometimes ideas are not fully scoped out so convincing leadership can get challenging and then a general fear of failure keeps you doing things that are familiar.”Anonymous B2B marketer On why change stalls inside teams
Where to go next
This report is not meant to end in a chart. It should help you choose the right next step, whether that is free education, a sharper system, or a more structured team rollout.
Best fit if the gap is strategy, content, distribution, paid, and measurement working together as one system.
See the course →Best fit if the bottleneck is cross-functional alignment, leadership buy-in, or closing the loop across revenue teams.
Explore CRO School →Best fit if you already have raw content and need a simpler way to turn it into repeatable output across channels.
See content repurposing →Best fit if you want to benchmark your thinking first and build your next step from articles, embedded episodes, frameworks, and field-tested examples.
Get the free resources →The complete training catalogue — formats, who each course is for, and what you leave with. Open it, save it as a PDF, or email it straight to yourself, your manager, or HR.
George Coudounaris
Co-founder & co-host, The B2B Playbook · 200+ podcast episodes
Kevin Chen
Co-founder & co-host, The B2B Playbook
The B2B Playbook (2026). "How B2B Marketing Teams Are Upskilling Right Now" — The Pulse: Marketing Upskilling Benchmark, Volume 01. Ongoing survey; fieldwork began June 20, 2025. https://theb2bplaybook.com/b2b-marketing-upskilling-report/
Media, analysts, and bloggers are welcome to reference this report with attribution and a link. Every headline stat on this page has its own anchor link for citing a specific finding.
Methodology: Survey responses collected by The B2B Playbook between June 20, 2025 and September 25, 2026. This is an ongoing survey. The report covers skill priorities, confidence, preferred learning formats, training outcomes, budget reality, approval paths, cadence, and open-text implementation challenges. Percentages are rounded for readability, and all quotes are anonymised.
100+ B2B marketing teams told us exactly where they’re investing, what’s working, and what gets in the way. Tell us about your situation and we’ll open a personalised version of this report matched to your focus areas, role, and goals.
Loading the survey...
Takes about 3 minutes. Your results link is private to you — revisit any time, or resubmit with the same email to refresh your results.
