1import{j as e}from"./react-vendor-D2FliqWS.js";import{S as r,o as i,U as n,N as o,B as l,F as d}from"./index-AkoDbT9k.js";import{b as c,I as m}from"./IndustryFAQ-k3N2MzM-.js";import{B as u,b2 as p}from"./icons-vendor-D8T1GgOg.js";import{L as x}from"./router-vendor-CW56NGyO.js";import"./radix-vendor-C04YnaJ8.js";import"./supabase-vendor-DgXH_Xwo.js";import"./charts-vendor-BPHaCAyc.js";import"./query-vendor-CPKlG3o2.js";import"./motion-vendor-BoDqZQvx.js";import"./forms-vendor-DmIF7iie.js";import"./embla-vendor-wdQqGq5F.js";import"./accordion-VS4NY8X5.js";const a=[{question:"How is M2M Tech different from C3.ai?",answer:"C3.ai delivers prebuilt AI applications and a development platform focused on enterprise-cloud workloads. M2M Tech is a Physical AI platform. It pairs industrial edge hardware (MEA Stack), agentic AI (ARC), and digital twin simulation (AURA) to run autonomous closed-loop decisions on the plant floor and in the field. C3.ai is cloud-first AI applications; M2M Tech is edge-first operational execution."},{question:"Is M2M Tech an alternative to C3 AI Suite?",answer:"For physical operations: manufacturing, energy, maritime, mining, defense. Yes. M2M Tech delivers the same predictive maintenance, inventory, and operational use cases C3 AI is known for, plus on-machine edge inference and supervised autonomous agents that act without analyst-in-the-loop."},{question:"Which deploys faster?",answer:"M2M Tech's phased model targets measurable outcomes in weeks, not months, starting with a single line, substation, or vessel. C3.ai's prebuilt applications can deploy quickly when your data is already in the cloud; for OT-heavy environments, the data preparation cycle is typically longer."},{question:"Which has better edge AI support?",answer:"M2M Tech is edge-native. The MEA Stack runs LLMs, VLMs, and ML models directly on industrial hardware with sub-10ms latency and no cloud dependency. C3.ai's architecture is cloud-first with edge as an extension."}],h=[{feature:"Industrial edge AI hardware",m2m:"MEA Stack (native)",c3:"Cloud extension"},{feature:"Autonomous agents on OT systems",m2m:"ARC platform",c3:"Applications + APIs"},{feature:"Digital twin simulation",m2m:"AURA Studio",c3:!1},{feature:"On-premise / air-gapped deployment",m2m:!0,c3:"Limited"},{feature:"Sub-10ms control-loop decisions",m2m:!0,c3:!1},{feature:"Prebuilt enterprise AI applications",m2m:"Industry blueprints",c3:"Core strength"},{feature:"Time to first measurable outcome",m2m:"Weeks",c3:"Quarters"},{feature:"Optimized for physical / OT industries",m2m:!0,c3:"Cross-industry cloud"}],s=t=>t===!0?e.jsx(u,{className:"w-5 h-5 text-primary mx-auto"}):t===!1?e.jsx(p,{className:"w-5 h-5 text-muted-foreground mx-auto"}):e.jsx("span",{className:"text-foreground",children:t});function T(){return e.jsxs("div",{className:"min-h-screen bg-background",children:[e.jsx(r,{title:"M2M Tech vs C3.ai | Physical AI Compared",description:"M2M Tech vs C3.ai compared: edge AI hardware, agentic execution, and digital twins versus cloud-first enterprise AI applications. See where each fits.",path:"/compare/m2m-tech-vs-c3-ai",keywords:"M2M Tech vs C3.ai, C3 AI alternative, physical AI vs C3, edge AI comparison, industrial AI platform comparison",jsonLd:[i,c(a)]}),e.jsx(n,{}),e.jsx(o,{}),e.jsx("section",{className:"pt-24 pb-12 lg:pt-32 lg:pb-16 bg-gradient-to-b from-background to-background-warm",children:e.jsxs("div",{className:"max-w-5xl mx-auto px-4 sm:px-6 lg:px-8 text-center",children:[e.jsx("p",{className:"text-sm font-semibold tracking-widest uppercase text-[hsl(var(--brand-yellow))] mb-4",children:"Platform Comparison"}),e.jsx("h1",{className:"text-4xl md:text-5xl lg:text-6xl font-black tracking-tight text-foreground mb-6 text-balance",children:"M2M Tech vs C3.ai"}),e.jsx("p",{className:"text-lg md:text-xl text-muted-foreground max-w-3xl mx-auto leading-relaxed",children:"C3.ai is cloud-first AI applications. M2M Tech is edge-first Physical AI. Agents that sense, decide, and act on the plant floor. Here's where each fits."})]})}),e.jsx("section",{className:"py-12 lg:py-16 bg-background",children:e.jsxs("div",{className:"max-w-5xl mx-auto px-4 sm:px-6 lg:px-8",children:[e.jsx("div",{className:"overflow-x-auto rounded-xl border border-border shadow-md",children:e.jsxs("table",{className:"w-full bg-card",children:[e.jsx("thead",{children:e.jsxs("tr",{className:"bg-background-warm border-b border-border",children:[e.jsx("th",{className:"text-left p-4 font-bold text-foreground",children:"Capability"}),e.jsx("th",{className:"text-center p-4 font-bold text-foreground",children:"M2M Tech"}),e.jsx("th",{className:"text-center p-4 font-bold text-muted-foreground",children:"C3.ai"})]})}),e.jsx("tbody",{children:h.map(t=>e.jsxs("tr",{className:"border-b border-border last:border-0",children:[e.jsx("td",{className:"p-4 text-foreground font-medium",children:t.feature}),e.jsx("td",{className:"p-4 text-center",children:s(t.m2m)}),e.jsx("td",{className:"p-4 text-center",children:s(t.c3)})]},t.feature))})]})}),e.jsx("p",{className:"text-xs text-muted-foreground mt-4 text-center",children:"Comparison based on publicly available product documentation. C3.ai is a registered trademark of C3.ai, Inc."})]})}),e.jsx(m,{industryName:"M2M Tech vs C3.ai",faqs:a}),e.jsx("section",{className:"py-16 bg-background-deep text-[hsl(var(--background-deep-foreground))]",children:e.jsxs("div",{className:"max-w-4xl mx-auto px-4 sm:px-6 lg:px-8 text-center",children:[e.jsx("h2",{className:"text-3xl md:text-4xl font-bold mb-4",children:"See where M2M Tech fits your operations."}),e.jsx(l,{asChild:!0,size:"lg",variant:"cta",className:"rounded-full",children:e.jsx(x,{to:"/assessment",children:"Get a Physical AI Blueprint"})})]})}),e.jsx(d,{})]})}
1export{T as default};
Line numbers count LF bytes from the start of the resource, as the search results do. Vendor segments are library code the classifier recognised; they are stored but not indexed. Bytes are shown as Latin1 characters, one per byte.