PageSourceSearch

https://safeinit.com/assets/ai-readiness-assessment-BWk1G-9t.js

js safeinit.com collected 2026-10-03 21:14:12 UTC 10,785 bytes, 1 lines download raw bytes

1import{l as e}from"./index-IhycRlMY.js";var t=`what-you-get`,n=`https://meetings-eu1.hubspot.com/cosmin-drimba/30-min-ai-readiness-assessment`,r=`/assets/assessment/safeinit-data-and-ai-readiness-assessment-sample.pdf`,i=`https://www.linkedin.com/in/cosmindrimba`,a={meta:{title:`Data and AI Readiness Assessment on AWS | safeINIT`,description:`A two to three week Data and AI readiness assessment for teams already on AWS: scorecard, target architecture, 12-month roadmap and business case. The verdict can be "not yet".`},hero:{label:`Data and AI readiness assessment`,heading:`An AI roadmap that can say`,accent:`"not\xA0yet"`,subhead:`In two to three weeks, the engineers who would build it tell you **which of your AI ideas your data and your AWS estate can carry today**, what has to be fixed first, what it costs to run, and in what order.`,showCtas:!0,showMetrics:!1,primaryCta:{label:`Book 30 minutes with Cosmin`,href:n,openInNewTab:!0},secondaryCta:{label:`Read a sample report`,href:r,openInNewTab:!0},visual:{brandHero:!0}},cta:e},o={eyebrow:`Calls in September, kickoffs in October`,slotsTotal:2,slotsOpen:2,heading:`Two kickoff slots in October`,lines:[`Call in September, kickoff in October, readout in November, before budgets close`,`Three weeks, about five sessions, one report your board can act on`,`Read-only access, nothing installed, nothing changed`],note:`The call decides whether it fits. We hold a slot only after that.`,cta:{label:`Book 30 minutes with Cosmin`,href:n},linkedin:{label:`Connect with Cosmin on LinkedIn`,href:i,avatarSrc:`/assets/about/team/cosmin-drimba.webp`,avatarAlt:`Cosmin Drimba`},sample:{label:`Read a sample report`,meta:`PDF, five pages`,href:r},free:{label:`Free`,forWhom:`for eligible companies already running on AWS`,detail:`AWS is supporting these assessments to evaluate the fit of AWS services. Subject to AWS approval, confirmed in writing before any work starts.`},stickyLabel:`Calls in September, kickoffs in October`,stickyCta:`Book 30 minutes`},s={id:`who-it-is-for`,heading:`Built for teams already running on AWS`,subhead:`The assessment is for a CTO, VP Engineering or founder who owns the decision and **can act on a roadmap in the next 6 to 12 months**. Three situations we see most often:`,cards:[{id:`pilot`,title:`The pilot works in the sandbox`,body:`Your Bedrock or SageMaker pilot works on the demo data. The board is asking when it ships. **Nobody has written down what stands between the two.**`},{id:`data`,title:`The data lives in six places`,body:`The use cases are clear. The data behind them sits in separate systems with no catalog and no owner, and **every AI plan stalls on that layer**.`},{id:`governance`,title:`Governance is blocking scale`,body:`PHI, GDPR data or customer contracts mean you cannot hand an AI system data you cannot govern.`}],notForHeading:`Not the right fit`,notFor:[`If your production workloads are not on AWS yet, this is a different conversation, and we will say so on the call.`,`If nobody on your side can act on the roadmap in the next 6 to 12 months, it is too early.`]},c={id:t,heading:`What you get`,subhead:`Five deliverables, written for the people who will decide, then presented live to your sponsor.`,samplePages:[{src:`/assets/assessment/preview/page-1.webp`,alt:`Cover: Data and AI readiness assessment for ACME Health, a fictional company, with the verdict "Proceed with conditions" and an overall score of 2.5 out of 4`},{src:`/assets/assessment/preview/page-2.webp`,alt:`Executive summary: the assistant is buildable in a quarter but the knowledge base is not ready, with cost of the status quo against the AWS run cost of the target design`},{src:`/assets/assessment/preview/page-3.webp`,alt:`Readiness scorecard: eight dimensions scored 0 to 4 for one use case, each with a one-line finding`},{src:`/assets/assessment/preview/page-4.webp`,alt:`Pattern page, semantic layer for AI: current state, target state, and the work in between with an owner and a phase for each line`},{src:`/assets/assessment/preview/page-5.webp`,alt:`Roadmap and business case: twelve months in three phases with two gates, and the number the sponsor checks`}],figureCaption:`Sample report for a fictional company. A real report runs to about thirty pages; these are the five sections a sponsor reads first.`,sampleCta:{label:`Read the full sample report`,meta:`PDF, five pages, fictional company`,href:r},items:[{id:`patterns`,title:`Pattern discovery`,body:`Which of your AI ideas map to which data and AI patterns, and where you stand on each: current state against target state, usually for two to four patterns.`},{id:`scorecard`,title:`Data and AI readiness scorecard`,body:`Data availability, quality, governance, architecture, skills and organisation, each scored out of 4, with one overall verdict: **proceed, proceed with conditions, or not yet**.`},{id:`architecture`,title:`AWS architecture recommendation`,body:`A service-level design per pattern, with the controls your data needs (PrivateLink, KMS, IAM boun
1daries) **designed in rather than added later**. Validated with your engineers before it goes in the report.`},{id:`roadmap`,title:`12-month roadmap`,body:`Quick wins in months 0 to 3, foundation in months 3 to 6, advanced work in months 6 to 12, with **a go/no-go gate between each phase** and the dependencies made explicit.`},{id:`business-case`,title:`Business case`,body:`Cost of the status quo, AWS run cost for the recommended architecture, payback period and a multi-year view. Numbers your finance team can check.`}]},l={id:`how-it-runs`,heading:`Three weeks, about five sessions, one readout`,subhead:`**Read-only access to your estate.** No production credentials, no agents installed, no change to anything.`,weeks:[{step:`01`,title:`Discovery`,body:`Interviews with your sponsor, platform lead and data owner. A read-only look at the AWS estate and the data landscape. We write down what the status quo costs you in your own numbers.`,output:`Prioritised list of use cases or infrastructure priorities, with the patterns they map to`},{step:`02`,title:`Patterns and architecture`,body:`Gap analysis per pattern, target architecture, sequencing. **One working session with your engineers** to check the design against what they know about the systems.`,output:`Scorecard and architecture recommendation, validated by your team`},{step:`03`,title:`Business case and readout`,body:`Run cost, payback, the roadmap with its gates. Then a live readout to your sponsor, where the report is **presented and questioned, not emailed**.`,output:`The full report and a roadmap you can start on the following week`}],needsHeading:`What we need from you`,needs:[`About five sessions of 60 to 120 minutes over the three weeks`,`Read-only access to the AWS estate and architecture documentation`,`The executive sponsor present at the readout`]},u={id:`after`,heading:`What happens after`,paragraphs:[`**The roadmap is yours.** If you build the first quick win with us, that is a separate piece of work, priced from the roadmap, not bundled into it. If your team builds it, the architecture is specific enough to hand over.`,`Managed operations can appear as an option in the third phase of the roadmap, when a governed AWS foundation is what the plan needs.`],proofHeading:`Who does the work`,proofBody:`The same engineers who write the assessment build the systems. AWS reviewed the AI systems we delivered for the AI Services Competency, **with the case studies public and the customers on the record**.`,proof:[{id:`esafetyfirst`,client:`eSafetyFirst`,metric:`90%`,caption:`of support contacts resolved by an agent on Amazon Bedrock, in English and French`,href:`/case-studies/esafetyfirst-ai-contact-center`},{id:`pc-parts`,client:`PC Parts`,metric:`65%`,caption:`of marketplace searches resolved by the agent; listings built 3x faster from a photo`,href:`/case-studies/pc-parts-marketplace-ai`}],badgeSrc:`/assets/about/competencies/ai-services-competency.svg`,badgeAlt:`AWS Partner AI Services Competency badge`},d={id:`assessment-faq`,heading:`Frequently asked questions`,body:`What people ask before booking the first call`,items:[{id:`cost`,question:`What does the assessment cost?`,answer:`Nothing, for eligible companies already running production on AWS. AWS is supporting these assessments to evaluate the fit of AWS services. That support is subject to AWS approval, which we confirm in writing before any work starts; if it does not come through, you can walk away at no charge. Anything outside the scope above is a separate, separately priced piece of work, and we say so up front.`},{id:`quiz`,question:`How is this different from the 90-second AWS assessment on your site?`,answer:`The [90-second AWS assessment](/assessment-score) is a self-serve questionnaire that gives you a score and a set of recommendations in minutes. This is two to three weeks of work by the engineers who build these systems, on your actual estate and data, ending in a roadmap and a business case your board can act on. If you want a quick read of where you stand before booking a call, [take the self-serve version first](/assessment-score).`},{id:`access`,question:`What access do you need?`,answer:`Read-only. Architecture documentation, cost data, and a read-only view of the AWS accounts and the data landscape. We install nothing and change nothing. For regulated data we look at structures and flows, not records.`},{id:`health-tech`,question:`We handle PHI. Does that change the assessment?`,answer:`Governance is in scope for every assessment, and for health data it is the first thing we look at. The architecture recommendation states the data handling per model, keeps inference on private networking, and builds on a [HIPAA-eligible foundation](/industries/healthcare). Where a model or a service is not the right fit for PHI, the report says so.`},{id:`people`,question:`Who is in the room?`,answer:`From your side: the sponsor who owns the decision, the platform or engineering lead, and whoever owns the data. From ours: Cosmin runs discovery and the readout, and one of our architects owns the scorecard and the design. See [who we are](/about-us).`}
1,{id:`obligation`,question:`Is this a sales exercise?`,answer:`The report and the roadmap are yours whether or not you work with us afterwards. Build work, if any, is a separate piece of work scoped from the roadmap.`}]},f={heading:`Want a straight answer on your AI plans?`,subhead:`30 minutes with Cosmin to see whether the assessment fits your situation. If it does not, you will hear that too.`,primaryCta:{label:`Book 30 minutes with Cosmin`,href:n,openInNewTab:!0},textLink:{label:`Or connect with Cosmin on LinkedIn`,href:i}};export{c as a,o as c,f as i,l,a as n,d as o,u as r,s,n as t};

Line numbers count LF bytes from the start of the resource, as the search results do. Vendor segments are library code the classifier recognised; they are stored but not indexed. Bytes are shown as Latin1 characters, one per byte.