PageSourceSearch

https://montplex.com/static/js/async/30.2eb09185.js

js montplex.com collected 2026-10-03 21:16:27 UTC 5,924 bytes, 1 lines download raw bytes

1"use strict";(self.webpackChunkengula_website=self.webpackChunkengula_website||[]).push([["30"],{1237:function(e,n,s){s.r(n),s.d(n,{default:()=>t});var r=s(2676),l=s(453);let c=s.p+"static/image/ecs_g8y_2xlarge_result.843d5c63.png",i=s.p+"static/image/ecs_c7a_4xlarge_result.e06adbf8.png",h=s.p+"static/image/ecs_c9i_2xlarge_result.fa2390ab.png";function a(e){let n=Object.assign({h1:"h1",a:"a",h2:"h2",ul:"ul",li:"li",strong:"strong",code:"code",h3:"h3",p:"p",img:"img"},(0,l.ah)(),e.components);return(0,r.jsxs)(r.Fragment,{children:[(0,r.jsxs)(n.h1,{id:"engula-autobench测试报告",children:["Engula AutoBench(测试报告)",(0,r.jsx)(n.a,{className:"header-anchor","aria-hidden":"true",href:"#engula-autobench测试报告",children:"#"})]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.h2,{id:"1-设计目标和对比方法",children:["1. 设计目标和对比方法",(0,r.jsx)(n.a,{className:"header-anchor","aria-hidden":"true",href:"#1-设计目标和对比方法",children:"#"})]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.ul,{children:["\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"目标"}),":对比 Engula 2.1 与 Redis 7.2 在不同 value 大小和 CPU 核数场景下的 Get/Set 吞吐与延迟表现。"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"指标"}),":QPS(吞吐量)、P50(平均延迟)。"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"对比方法说明"}),":","\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.ul,{children:["\n",(0,r.jsx)(n.li,{children:"单机对比,关闭持久化,专注内存路径与协议处理性能。"}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:["I/O 线程数维度:",(0,r.jsx)(n.code,{children:"io-threads"})," ∈ {1, 2, 4}。"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsx)(n.li,{children:"数据规模、请求分布、并发模型固定,结果可重复。"}),"\n",(0,r.jsx)(n.li,{children:"Value 大小多档位覆盖:8B、32B、128B、512B、1KB、2KB。"}),"\n"]}),"\n"]}),"\n"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.h2,{id:"2-测试环境",children:["2. 测试环境",(0,r.jsx)(n.a,{className:"header-anchor","aria-hidden":"true",href:"#2-测试环境",children:"#"})]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.h3,{id:"21-硬件与系统",children:["2.1 硬件与系统",(0,r.jsx)(n.a,{className:"header-anchor","aria-hidden":"true",href:"#21-硬件与系统",children:"#"})]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.ul,{children:["\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"实例"}),":阿里云 ecs.c9i.xlarge / ecs.c7a.4xlarge / ecs.g8y.2xlarge"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"CPU"}),":8 vCPU ~ 16 vCPU"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"内存"}),":32 GB"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"操作系统"}),":CentOS 7.9"]}),"\n"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.h2,{id:"3-engula-autobench",children:["3. Engula AutoBench",(0,r.jsx)(n.a,{className:"header-anchor","aria-hidden":"true",href:"#3-engula-autobench",children:"#"})]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.p,{children:["本次测试使用 Engula AutoBench 工具。工具的具体介绍见文档:",(0,r.jsx)(n.a,{href:"/zh/docs/tools/autobench/index",children:"Engula AutoBench 工具用法"}),"。"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.h2,{id:"4-测试结果",children:["4. 测试结果",(0,r.jsx)(n.a,{className:"header-anchor","aria-hidden":"true",href:"#4-测试结果",children:"#"})]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.h3,{id:"ecsc9i2xlarge",children:["ecs.c9i.2xlarge",(0,r.jsx)(n.a,{className:"header-anchor","aria-hidden":"true",href:"#ecsc9i2xlarge",children:"#"})]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.ul,{children:["\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"CPU"}),":Intel\xae Xeon\xae Granite Rapids * 8"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"内存"}),":16 GB"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"操作系统"}),":CentOS 7.9"]}),"\n"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsx)(n.p,{children:(0,r.jsx)("img",{src:h,alt:"ecs.c9i.2xlarge 结果"})}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.h3,{id:"ecsc7a4xlarge",children:["ecs.c7a.4xlarge",(0,r.jsx)(n.a,{className:"header-anchor","aria-hidden":"true",href:"#ecsc7a4xlarge",children:"#"})]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.ul,{children:["\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"CPU"}),":AMD EPYC™ MILAN * 16"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"内存"}),":32 GB"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"操作系统"}),":CentOS 7.9"]}),"\n"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsx)(n.p,{children:(0,r.jsx)("img",{src:i,alt:"ecs.c7a.4xlarge 结果"})}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.h3,{id:"ecsg8y2xlarge",children:["ecs.g8y.2xlarge",(0,r.jsx)(n.a,{className:"header-anchor","aria-hidden":"true",href:"#ecsg8y2xlarge",children:"#"})]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.ul,{children:["\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"CPU"}),":倚天 710 * 8"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"内存"}),":32 GB"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsxs)(n.li,{children:[(0,r.jsx)(n.strong,{children:"操作系统"}),":CentOS 7.9"]}),"\n"]}),"\n",(0,r.jsx)(n.p,{children:(0,r.jsx)("img",{src:c,alt:"ecs.g8y.2xlarge 结果"})})]})}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{},{wrapper:n}=Object.assign({},(0,l.ah)(),e.components);return n?(0,r.jsx)(n,{...e,children:(0,r.jsx)(a,{...e})}):a(e)}let t=d;d.__RSPRESS_PAGE_META={},d.__RSPRESS_PAGE_META["zh%2Fdocs%2Ftools%2Fautobench%2Freport.md"]={toc:[{text:"1. 设计目标和对比方法",id:"1-设计目标和对比方法",depth:2},{text:"2. 测试环境",id:"2-测试环境",depth:2},{text:"2.1 硬件与系统",id:"21-硬件与系统",depth:3}
1,{text:"3. Engula AutoBench",id:"3-engula-autobench",depth:2},{text:"4. 测试结果",id:"4-测试结果",depth:2},{text:"ecs.c9i.2xlarge",id:"ecsc9i2xlarge",depth:3},{text:"ecs.c7a.4xlarge",id:"ecsc7a4xlarge",depth:3},{text:"ecs.g8y.2xlarge",id:"ecsg8y2xlarge",depth:3}],title:"Engula AutoBench(测试报告)",headingTitle:"Engula AutoBench(测试报告)",frontmatter:{}}}}]);

Line numbers count LF bytes from the start of the resource, as the search results do. Vendor segments are library code the classifier recognised; they are stored but not indexed. Bytes are shown as Latin1 characters, one per byte.